You are searching about How Much To Feed Dog Based On Weight Raw Food, today we will share with you article about How Much To Feed Dog Based On Weight Raw Food was compiled and edited by our team from many sources on the internet. Hope this article on the topic How Much To Feed Dog Based On Weight Raw Food is useful to you.
A Shocking Look at Cancer Studies, With Filmmaker Mike Anderson
In this article, Mike Anderson shares his film “Killing Cancer from the Inside Out” and a shocking look at cancer studies. Mike Anderson, is a medical researcher, author of The Rave Diet and filmmaker/producer of “Eating” and “Healing Cancer from the Inside Out”.
Kevin: OK good. I want to talk a little bit about the other movie, “Killing Cancer
from the inside out.” Just seeing that title kind of opens a can of worms. First, let’s talk about where that idea came from.
Mike: The idea is that conventional medicine always what I call external medicine… They bring their tools from outside and use external means to cure something, like cutting out a tumor through surgery or something like that. Whereas you really heal cancer from the inside out, because cancer means that there is something completely wrong with your body. A tumor is just a symptom of it. Your body’s entire biochemistry is essentially destroyed. And what you need to do is change it. The only way you can change that biochemistry and make your body unfriendly to cancer cells is primarily through diet. Of course attitude and mind and stress play a role, but I think it varies from person to person. I don’t think it’s nearly as important as the diet itself. If you look at cancer cells themselves, what kind of environment do they like? Acidic environment that is low in oxygen because they can survive without oxygen and a whole host of other things. That’s the kind of environment they thrive in, and that’s the kind of environment produced by eating the standard American diet. It should come as no surprise that we have such a cancer epidemic simply because the vast majority of cancers are caused by diet; no doubt about it.
Kevin: Was there a reason you made the film?
Mike: I always wanted to do something about cancer and this guy in Florida kind of pushed me over the edge and encouraged me to do it. It turned out to be very… Any project, going into it, it turned out to be a much bigger project than I imagined. The cancer industry itself, I mean, it’s been criticized for a long time.
If you look, I give statistics at the beginning of the movie, it was from a report done by a couple of oncologists in Australia, it looked at clinical trials over a 14-year period up to 2004. What they showed were the treatments for all our major cancers are totally ineffective. What is unique about that study is that they used absolute numbers. This means that absolute versus relative numbers. If you take a study in the cancer industry and translate the results into absolute numbers, you will get the grim result. Like 00000 successes and 5-year survival rates for breast, uterus, whatever kind of cancer, cervix, whatever kind of cancer you want. Relative numbers mean just that. They are relative to something else, like a previous study, and they can show improvement. They are not 1 in 100 people.
I tell people that if you’re ready for any treatment, go to your doctor and say, “Out of 100 people, how many will benefit from this?” Well, doctor, let’s take tamoxifen for example. The doctor will say, “Well, if you take tamoxifen for five years, it will reduce your chances of breast cancer recurrence by 49%.” It’s a bald-faced lie. It is a relative number. If you take the absolute number, it’s only 1.6 people out of 100, instead of you getting a good impression, 49 people out of 100 will benefit from this. But it’s only 1.6, and the patient needs to know that. It could happen by chance, it’s that low. It could be a placebo effect, it is so low.
All of these, for our major cancers, are all below 10%, well below 10% in terms of effectiveness. But what the cancer industry has done is use relative statistics. If you go to the American Cancer Society facts and figures, you’ll see that every single number in there has “Relative” in front of it, and it’s a big mystery. Relative, compared to what? It could be a previous study. It is a manipulated number and it is completely false.
So, just like in the case of tamoxifen, they show that the drug is almost 50 times more effective than it actually is. And that impresses the patients. People who know these statistics will say that a patient should never be given relative numbers because they do not understand them; they are for statisticians. It’s not just patients, but oncologists. Since making the film, I’ve talked to half a dozen oncologists who don’t even know the difference between relative and absolute numbers. They just read the medicine sheets and they match the numbers to the patients and they say, “Oh, that sounds pretty good. OK, let’s do it.” They do not know. That to me is fraud. I mean, especially if the oncologist knows about it
and he presents a 49% effective treatment when it is actually only 1.6% effective. It’s just wrong.
I wouldn’t do it. I don’t think anyone in their right mind would do that. I mean, you’d be better off taking a placebo and a beer instead of taking that drug. But it’s true across the board there, incredibly inefficient.
I was watching the “morning show” on ABC and this Nancy Schneiderman was on and they said early stage breast cancer had a 91% cure rate, right, over 5 years. Well, that’s just nonsense. You can do nothing and have the same stats. You can do absolutely nothing about breast cancer and have the same statistics. Actually it should be higher because breast cancer is a very slow growing cancer and you should get that easily if it is an early stage cancer. But they manipulate numbers, they make the treatments look much more effective than they really are, because there is a lot of money involved in this, a lot of money. If you translated all the numbers into absolute numbers, the cancer industry would be out of business. These are the figures presented to Congress. These are the numbers they present to Congress to get more funding. They are totally manipulated and no one knows it. So anyway, I can’t even remember the original question.
Kevin: That was the amazing thing. So let’s just run through the numbers here for people who may still not be that math savvy, which I’m not either, but let me see if I get it right. For example, say something worked 1 in 100 people. If they found something in the study that worked for 2 out of 100 people, that would be 100% increase, right?
Mike: Right, right.
Kevin: So they could say that whatever it was, in the new study, the success rate improved by 100%.
Mike: Exactly, exactly. And you can take like a mammogram, which is a big scam;
you take two groups, say a quarter of a million people in each group. This is no lie because that is exactly how it works. The people who got regular mammograms say three people got breast cancer who got regular mammograms. Let’s say four people got breast cancer from those who didn’t get mammograms. Well, instead of looking at the population of 225,000 in each group, they take the difference between three people and four people and say that’s a 25% reduction in the incidence of breast cancer due to mammography.
Mike: Actually, if you take the full million people, or half a million people, three
people with the mammography group and four got breast cancer with the non-mammography group, that’s nothing. It’s only 0.000000000. But they say a 25% reduction in breast cancer due to mammography. It’s just a bald-faced lie. Much has been published about this, but you will never see it in the mainstream news. You just don’t want to.
Kevin: Wow, when you hear 25% reduction, I mean that’s 1 in 4.
Mike: Yes, it is impressive. I go into the movie and say, I don’t remember the exact numbers, but these are right. You have to say, “What are the actual benefits of mammography?” Well, a woman in her 40s who gets regular mammograms is going to live nine extra days. A woman in her 50s, she wants to live like 7 extra days. A woman in her 60s will live five extra days.
Something like that; it’s in the movie. And so you look at this, and you throw out all these relative statistics, and then you go, “Well, what are the benefits? It’s supposed to extend my life.” The benefits are not there at all.
Kevin: What was it like talking to oncologists?
Mike: They were hostile. They live off this. I tell you, uniformly, they love part 1, except for the statistical part. That’s the one part they didn’t like because they didn’t really understand it. These are the people who administer these ineffective drugs. I mean, I had a guy… Hodgkins is their claim to fame. The American Cancer Society will say in their facts and figures book that it has an 85% cure rate.
Well, that’s nonsense. It is a relative statistic. If you look at the absolute number, it is about 40%. It’s even worse than that, but they don’t understand that. They will tell their patients, “Yes, it has an 85% cure rate.” Well, they think that 85 people out of 100 will be cured from this. Whereas it’s actually 40 and this is their best. Hodgkin’s is their very best treatment. But what they don’t say is that it’s a five-year cure. What happens after five years? Well, the cures are starting to drop precipitously with Hodgkin’s and other diseases, the lymphomas where they have, their leukemia where they have quite a lot of success just with childhood leukemia. But what happens is that over time the cancers come back, they get other problems because of the treatments. They have liver disease, they can die of liver failure, and all sorts of other things that go beyond that five-year period. And that really skews it downward.
Video about How Much To Feed Dog Based On Weight Raw Food
You can see more content about How Much To Feed Dog Based On Weight Raw Food on our youtube channel: Click Here
Question about How Much To Feed Dog Based On Weight Raw Food
If you have any questions about How Much To Feed Dog Based On Weight Raw Food, please let us know, all your questions or suggestions will help us improve in the following articles!
The article How Much To Feed Dog Based On Weight Raw Food was compiled by me and my team from many sources. If you find the article How Much To Feed Dog Based On Weight Raw Food helpful to you, please support the team Like or Share!
Rate Articles How Much To Feed Dog Based On Weight Raw Food
Rate: 4-5 stars
Search keywords How Much To Feed Dog Based On Weight Raw Food
How Much To Feed Dog Based On Weight Raw Food
way How Much To Feed Dog Based On Weight Raw Food
tutorial How Much To Feed Dog Based On Weight Raw Food
How Much To Feed Dog Based On Weight Raw Food free
#Shocking #Cancer #Studies #Filmmaker #Mike #Anderson